Navigating Opposition and Promoting Constructive Dialogue in the Context of Cancel Culture: Lessons from Islamic Teachings

Authors

  • Abubakar Abdulkadir Umaru Musa Yar'adua University, Katsina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58575/ki.v4i1.52

Keywords:

Prophet Lūt, Cancel culture, Woke ideology, Constructive dialogue

Abstract

This paper explores the parallels between the historical struggle of Prophet Lūt in Sodom and the contemporary phenomenon of cancel culture within woke circles. It examines the nuanced Islamic teachings embedded in Sūratu Hūd verses 74-82 vis-à-vis the contemporary dynamics of cancel culture to foster a deeper understanding of the common threads that connect these seemingly disparate narratives. Prophet Lūt had in a revolutionary and vigorous manner challenged the prevailing norm of deviant sexual proclivity in defense of moral virtues, hence he got canceled. The city of Sodom was destroyed in a catastrophic event the like of which was never heard of throughout human history. This is because deviant sexual proclivity has become the norm rather than the exception in Sodom. In what appears to be a striking parallel, the Western liberal agenda is adopting a radical and revolutionary strategy to bring forth queer revolutionism as manifest in the five elements of the liberal idiom; ‘liberal’ religious ideals, gay rights, ‘academic’ liberalism, the discourse of hate, and the discourse of social justice. Hence the paper argues that Muslim ethicists should employ the Quranic methodology couched in Sūratu Hūd to constructively engage the liberal queer machinations in all its idiomatic elements in defense of pristine moral virtues. And unless the believers do so, there will be great oppression and corruption on earth.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Abubakar Abdulkadir, Umaru Musa Yar'adua University, Katsina

Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty Of Humanities, Umaru Musa Yar’adua University, Katsina, Nigeria.

References

J. Butler, J. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Harvard University Press, 2015.

N.A. Nuamah, N. A. Cancel Culture: A Tool for Progress or the Road to Ruin? The Point Magazine, 2021, January 15

C. Pash. Engaging Productively in Online Conflict: An Analysis of Cancel Culture. International Journal of Communication, vol. 14, 2020, pp. 365-371.

B. Rand, G. David., et al. Social Heuristics Shape Intuitive Cooperation. Nature Communications, vol. 5, no. 3677, 2014.

A.Y. Ali. The Meaning of the Holy Qur'an: Text, Translation and Commentary. Amana Publications, 2000.

Ali, The Meaning of the Holy Qur'an,421.

J. Khaleel. The Story of Lūt in the Quran. The Islamic Monthly, 2015, September 2.

M. Hilali, and K.M. Taqi-ud-Din. The Noble Qur'an. Riyadh, Darussalam Publishers, 2003. P. 375

Khaleel, The Story of Lūt in the Quran, 3.

Ibid.,

Ali, The Meaning of the Holy Qur'an,341.

Hilali, and Taqi-ud-Din, The Noble Qur'an, 376.

H. Ibn Kathir. Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm. Dar Al-fikr. 1993. P.385.

M.J. Al-Tabari. Jāmiʿ al-bayān ʿan taʾwīl āy al-Qurʾān. Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyah. 1983.

Ibn Kathir. Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm, 421.

Khaleel, The Story of Lūt in the Quran, 3.

M.W. Dixon. The Practice of Cancel Culture: Implications for Communication, Power, and Ethics. Communication Quarterly, vol. 68, no. 2, 2020, pp. 217-238.

Ibid.,

C. Schamel. The Liberal as an Enemy of Queer Justice. A Social Justice Forum, vol 6 issue 1, 2020. www.trace.tennesse.edu

Ibid.,

M.C. Nisbet, M.C., and N. Brendan. The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 22, 2019, pp. 129-146.

E.G. Krumhuber, et al. Empathy in Virtual Reality: Enhanced Perspective Taking through Access to the Plight of Others. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 62, 2016, pp. 526-533. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/computers-in-human-behavior

Ibid.,

A. Kohn. The Limits of Call-Out Culture: A Conversation with Loretta Ross. The New Yorker. 2019, October 2.

Hilali, and Taqi-ud-Din, The Noble Qur'an, 396.

Transmitted by Muslim hadith no. 2041.

Hilali, and Taqi-ud-Din, The Noble Qur'an, 377.

N.A. Nuamah. Cancel Culture: A Tool for Progress or the Road to Ruin? The Point Magazine. 2021, January 15.

Ibid.,

Rand, David., et al. Social Heuristics Shape, 8.

Pash. Engaging Productively in Online Conflict, 368.

Ibid.,

T. Ramadan. The Messenger: The Meanings of the Life of Muhammad. Penguin UK. 2008

Ali, The Meaning of the Holy Qur'an,461.

Hilali, and Taqi-ud-Din, The Noble Qur'an, 387.

Hilali, and Taqi-ud-Din, The Noble Qur'an, 347.

Ali, The Meaning of the Holy Qur'an,461.

Ö. Sensoy and D. Robin. Towards a conception of white guilt: Implications for white Americans. Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 12, no. 3, 2009, pp. 301-317.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2024

How to Cite

Abubakar Abdulkadir. (2024). Navigating Opposition and Promoting Constructive Dialogue in the Context of Cancel Culture: Lessons from Islamic Teachings. Karachi Islamicus, 4(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.58575/ki.v4i1.52
Abstract views: 132 / PDF downloads: 55